
Palace Lantern of Han
Dynasty (206 BC-220AD)
Why
is the development of bureaucracy so important? Well, first of
all, because ancient China was a big country. In 206 BC, when the
Han dynasty was founded, China stretched from modern Shenyang
(some 500 km north of Beijing) in the north to around Guilin in
the south; from the Pacific in the east to well past Chongqing in
the west. Until Russia laid claim to Far East Siberia, China was
the largest country in the world. It was also the most populous
(60 million people at the time), and still is (however, India will
probably overtake China in terms of population some time early in
the 21th century). This is a management issue of tremendous
proportions. How are you going to do things like collect taxes,
keep the peace, and basically run a government without
bureaucracy? The Chinese bureaucratic system is based on the study
of the Confucian Classics, which provide an ideological reference
point for proper behavior (which was often ignored, but it worked
well enough) and loyalty to the Emperor. By developing this
system, the Han emperors were able to run China with a reasonable
degree of efficiency.
During
the reign of an emperor named Han Wudi lived a historian named
Sima Qian. His most important contribution to Chinese history was
that he wrote a book known as Records of the Grand Historian
(actually, he claimed to just be completing a book that his
father, Sima Tan, had started, but most of the book is Sima Qian's).
Most history books are very linear: first you talk about the
Greeks, then the Romans, then the Dark Ages, and so on. What Sima
did was structure his book so that each chapter covered a
different topic: one chapter was a political record of the kings
and emperors; the next would cover literature; the third,
philosophy, and so on. Every dynastic record that followed copied
Sima's original. Actually, there is an English-language history of
China that loosely follows this model; it's called China's
Imperial Past, written by Charles O. Hucker.
Between
AD 8 and 25, a man named Wang Mang ruled China. He had been part
of the Han royal household; he himself, however, was a commoner
and had no royal blood in his veins. He had been appointed emperor
after a power struggle in the Han house. History is mixed on him.
While he did seem to have some good, reform-oriented ideas (e.g.
power back to the people), he really wasn't up to the task of
ruling. After his death in AD 25, the Han royal family took back
the reins of power, and set up the Later Han dynasty.
The
later Han were able to keep it together for about 200 years;
however, towards the end of their rule, they become more and more
dissolute. More importantly, they were unable to deal with two
factors: a population shift from the Yellow River in the north to
the Yangzi in the south; and they simply could not control
barbarian tribal raiders from the north, which were one reason why
people were moving to the south. Eventually, in AD 220, the center
had lost so much control to the provinces that it collapsed (a
small rebellion in the north helped), plunging China into 350
years of chaos and disunity.
Back
to the Index
While
there was a great deal of political activity occurring during this
period, most of it, consisting as it was of various wars between
different kingdoms (one of the great novels of China, The Romance
of the Three Kingdoms, is about this period), was not terribly
important to the later development of China. Perhaps its greatest
accomplishment was to reinforce in Chinese thought the importance
of having "one Emperor over China, like one sun in the
sky."
Socially,
though, there were two important developments. The first was that
the ethnic Han Chinese kept on moving south, while 'barbarians'
moved into the north and assimilated themselves into Chinese
society. The second development was Buddhism, which had had its
start in India sometime in the 6th century BC, when the Buddha
probably lived. It was introduced into China around the middle of
the first century AD (probably about the same time that the early
Christians were writing the Gospels), but really didn't catch on
until the fall of the Han dynasty.
Buddhism
competed strongly with Confucianism, and for a long time, pretty
much eclipsed it as a major cultural force. For various reasons --
some political, some social -- it spread very quickly throughout
China. It also changed somewhat from the Indian original, which,
as far as I know, is not practiced anymore anywhere in the world.
From China, Buddhism would spread into Tibet, Southeast Asia,
Korea, and Japan.
Buddhism
also merged somewhat with Daoism, particularly as a popular
religion; and while the process may be compared to Christianity's
appropriation of indigenous European beliefs and traditions,
Daoism maintained its own identity and was not subsumed into
popular Buddhism.
Back
to the Index
The
most important thing to know about this dynasty is that it was
very short (by dynastic standards) and that it did a pretty good
job of re-unifying China. Because it had a northern power base, it
was part barbarian, as was the Tang. Despite the fact that the
royal houses of Sui and succeeding Tang were not entirely Han
Chinese, both of these dynasties are considered to be Chinese, as
opposed to the Mongols and Manchus later on.
The
Tang are considered to be one of the great dynasties of Chinese
history; many historians rank them right behind the Han. They
extended the boundaries of China through Siberia in the North,
Korea in the east, and were in what is now Vietnam in the South.
They even extended a corridor of control along the Silk Road well
into modern-day Afghanistan.
There
are two interesting historical things about the Tang. The first is
the Empress Wu, the only woman ever to actually bear the title
'Emperor' (or, in her case, Empress).The second was the An Lushan
Rebellion, which marked the beginning of the end for the Tang.
The
Empress Wu was not a nice person. She makes Catherine the Great
look like an angel of mercy. While Empress Wu was still a
concubine in the imperial Tang household, she deposed of a rival
by murdering her own son, and then claiming her rival did it. In
her own vicious, ruthless, scheming way, she was absolutely
brilliant. Had Machiavelli known of her, he probably would have
written "The Princess."
The
An Lushan Rebellion had its roots in the behavior of one of the
great emperors of Chinese history, Xuanzong. Until he fell in love
with a young concubine named Yang Yuhuan, he had been a great
ruler, and had brought the Tang to its height of prosperity and
grandeur. He was so infatuated with Yang that the administration
of the government soon fell into decay, which was not made any
better by the fact that Yang took advantage of her power to stuff
high administrative positions with her corrupt cronies. She also
took under her wing a general named An Lushan, who quickly
accumulated power.
An
Lushan eventually decided that he would make a pretty good
emperor, and launched his rebellion. The civil war lasted for
eight years, and was, for the years 755-763, pretty destructive.
The emperor was forced to flee the capital, and on the way, the
palace guard, blaming Yang Yuhuan for all the problems that had
beset the dynasty (to be fair, it wasn't all her fault; there were
forces of political economy at work that were pretty much beyond
anybody's control), strangled her and threw her corpse in a ditch.
There is a legend that what actually happened was that the emperor
had procured a peasant look-alike who was actually the one killed,
but as far as I know, that is only fiction. Anyway, the rebellion
pretty much shattered centralized Tang control, and for the
remaining 150 years of the dynasty, the country slowly
disintegrated.
Back
to the Index
The
Song (pronounced Soong) dynasty ranks up there with the Tang and
the Han as one of the great dynasties. Fifty years after the
official end of the Tang, an imperial army re-unified China and
established the Song dynasty. A time of remarkable advances in
technology, culture, and economics, the Song, despite its
political failures, basically set the stage for the rest of the
imperial era. The most important development during the Song was
that agricultural technology, aided by the importation of a
fast-growing Vietnamese strain of rice and the invention of the
printing press, developed to the point where the food-supply
system was so efficient that, for the most part, there was no need
to develop it further. There was enough food for everyone, more or
less, the system worked, and it became self-sustaining. Because it
worked, there was no incentive to improve it; the system thus
remained basically unchanged from the Song up until the twentieth
century. In fact, many rice farmers in the Chinese interior and in
less-developed regions of Southeast Asia are, for the most part,
still using Song-era farming techniques.
The
efficiency of the system not only made it economically
self-sustaining, but also re-enforced the existing social
structure. Consequently, society and economics were largely static
from the Song until the collapse of the dynastic system in the
twentieth century.
This
is important because one of the factors behind the Industrial
Revolution in Europe was that they didn't have enough people to
work the fields. There was an incentive to create better
technology in Europe; there was no need in China. China actually
had a surplus of human labor.
While
the Song was a time of great advances, politically and militarily,
the Song was a failure. The northern half of China was conquered
by barbarians, forcing the dynasty to abandon a northern capital
in the early 1100's. Then a hundred and fifty years later, the
Mongols, fresh from conquering everything between Manchuria and
Austria, invaded and occupied China.
Back
to the Index
While
time of Mongol rule is called a dynasty, it was in fact a
government of occupation. While the Mongols did use existing
governmental structures for the duration, the language they used
was Mongol, and many of the officials they used were non-Chinese.
Mongols, Uygurs from central Asia, some Arabs and even an Italian
named Marco Polo all served as officials for the Mongol
government. One of the more significant accomplishments of the
Mongol tenure was the preservation of China as we know it in that
China wasn't turned into pastureland for the Mongolian ponies,
which not only was common Mongolian practice for territories
they'd overrun but had actually been advocated by some of the
conquering generals.
The
Yuan dynasty also featured the famous Khubilai Khan, who, among
other things, extended the Grand Canal. While in many ways, the
Yuan was a disaster, the reluctance of the Mongols to hire
educated Chinese for governmental posts resulted in a remarkable
cultural flowering; for example, Beijing Opera was invented during
the Yuan. On the other hand, attempts to analyze the failure of
the Song in keeping barbarians out China led to the rise and
dominance of Neo-Confucianism, a notoriously conservative (if not
outright reactionary) brand of Confucianism that had originally
developed during the Song.
Back
to the Index
Then
came the Ming. The Ming rulers distinguished themselves by being
fatter, lazier, crazier, and nastier than the average Imperial
family. After the first Ming Emperor discovered that his prime
minister was plotting against him, not only was the prime minister
beheaded, but his entire family and anyone even remotely connected
with him. Eventually, about 40,000 (no, that is not a misprint)
people were executed in connection with this case alone. They were
also virulent Neo-Confucianists.
In
the early 1400s, a sailor named Zheng He (with a fleet of some
300-plus ships) sailed as far west as Mogadishu and Jiddah, and he
may (or may not) have gotten to Madagascar. This is nearly 100
years before Columbus had the idea of trying to sail to Asia the
long way around. But once the sailors came back, the trips were
never followed up on. Conservative scholars at court failed to see
the importance of them. For the first time in history, China was
turning inwards, clinging to an incorrect interpretation of an
outmoded philosophy.
Back
to the Index
In
1644, the Manchus took over China and founded the Qing dynasty.
The Qing weren't the worst rulers; under them the arts flowered
(China's greatest novel, a work known variously as The Dream of
the Red Chamber, A Dream of Red Mansions, and The Story of the
Stone, was written during the Qing) and culture bloomed. Moreover,
they attempted to copy Chinese institutions and philosophy to a
much greater extent than the Mongols of the Yuan. However, in
their attempt to emulate the Chinese, they were even more
conservative and inflexible than the Ming. Their approach to
foreign policy, which was to make everyone treat the Emperor like
the Son of Heaven and not acknowledge other countries as being
equal to China, didn't rub the West the right way, even when the
Chinese were in the moral right (as in the Opium Wars, which
netted Britain Hong Kong and Kowloon).
To
live during the Qing Dynasty was to live in interesting times.
Most importantly, the Western world attempted to make contact on a
government-to-government basis, and, at least initially, failed.
The Chinese (more specifically, the ultra-conservative Manchus)
had no room in their world-view for the idea of independent, equal
nations (this viewpoint, to a certain degree, still persists
today). There was the rest of the world, and then there was China.
It wasn't that they rejected the idea of a community of nations;
it's that they couldn't conceive of it. It would be like trying to
teach a Buddhist monk about the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost.
This viewpoint was so pervasive that Chinese reformers who
advocated more flexibility in China's dealings with the West were
often accused of being Westerners with Chinese faces.

"Banquet
at Yingtai" by Zhang Hao (1736-1795)
Other
problems that plagued the late (1840 onwards) Qing included
rampant corruption, a steady decentralization of power, and the
unfortunate fact that they were losing control on too many fronts
at the same time. Rebellions sprouted like mushrooms after a rain;
apocalyptic cults undermined what little official authority
remained. Several of the rebellions, such as the Taiping
Rebellion, very nearly succeeded. Compounding the problems was
squabbling between various reformers who disagreed on how to best
combat the chaos and the West (not necessarily in that order); in
hindsight, it is clear that the entire system was slowly
collapsing. An excellent account of this period is Frederic
Wakeman Jr.'s The Fall of Imperial China.
The
attitude of the Western powers towards China (England, Russia,
Germany, France, and the United States, were, more or less, the
primary players) was strangely ambivalent. On the one hand, they
did their best to undermine what they considered to be restrictive
trading and governmental regulations; the best (or worst,
depending on your point of view) example of that was the British
smuggling of opium into Southern China. Other examples included
the 'right' for foreign navies to sail up Chinese rivers and
waterways, and extra-territoriality, which meant that if a British
citizen committed a crime in Qing China, he would be tried in a
British council under British law. Most of these 'rights' came
into being under a series of treaties that came to be known, and
rightly so, as the Unequal Treaties.
On
the other hand, they did do their best to prop up the ailing Qing,
the most notable example being the crushing of the Boxer Rebellion
in 1900 by foreign troops (primarily U.S. Marines). What the
Western powers were interested in was the carving up of China for
their own purposes, and that, paradoxically, required keeping
China together.
But
two things happened to prevent that. First, in 1911, the Qing
dynasty collapsed and China plunged headlong into chaos. Second,
in 1914, the Archduke Ferdinand told his driver to go down a
street in Sarajevo he shouldn't have, and Europe plunged headlong
into chaos.
Back
to the Index
During
World War I, the Chinese Government, such as it was, sided with
the Allies. In return, they were promised that the German
concessions in Shandong Province would be handed back over to the
Chinese Government at the end of the war. They weren't, and to add
insult to injury, the Treaty of Versailles handed them over to
Japan. On May 4, 1919, about 3,000 students from various Beijing
universities got together in Tiananmen Square and held a mass
protest. The movement that was born at that rally (called, not
unsurprisingly, the May Fourth Movement) was the first true
nationalist movement in China and has consequently served as an
inspiration for Chinese patriots of all shades, stripes, and
ideologies since.
In
the early 1920s, Dr. Sun Yat-sen, as the leader of the (up-to-then
unsuccessful) Nationalist Party (KMT), accepted Soviet aid. With
the Communist help, Sun Yat-sen was able to forge an alliance with
the fledgling Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and started the task
of re-unifying a China beset with warlords.
Unfortunately,
Sun died of cancer in 1925. The leadership of the KMT was then
taken over by Chiang Kai-shek.
After
Chiang took over the KMT, he launched his famous "Northern
Expedition" -- all the way from Guangzhou to Shanghai. This
unified Southern China and, more importantly, let the Nationalists
control the Lower Yangzi. Once they got to Shanghai, Chiang, who
had never liked the Communists anyway, launched a massacre of CCP
members. Among those who managed to escape the carnage was a young
communist named Mao Zedong.
The
Communists were forced to abandon their urban bases and fled to
the countryside. There, the Nationalist forces (aided and abetted
by German 'advisors') tried to hunt them down, and in the words
(more or less) of Chiang, "eliminate the cancer of
Communism." In 1934, the Nationalists were closing in on the
Communist positions, when, under the cover of night, the
Communists broke out and started running. They didn't stop for a
year.
This
was the Long March. When the Communists started, they had 100,000
people. A year later, when they finally stopped, they had traveled
6,000 miles, and were down to between four to eight thousand
people.
Part
of the problem is that they didn't know where they were going.
They started in Jiangxi Province, about 400 km northeast of
Guangzhou. Then they headed west, past Guilin, and into Yunnan
Province, in southwest China. They would have stopped there, but
the local warlords weren't really happy about having them. At
Kunming, the capital of Yunnan Province, they turned north, past
Chengdu in Sichuan Province, and eventually ended up in Shaanxi,
near Yan'an. From then on, being a Long Marcher was the mark of
aristocracy in the CCP. Deng Xiaoping, the former paramount leader
of China, was a Long Marcher. With Deng's passing, there are few,
if any Long Marchers left in the Party elite.
While
in Yan'an, on the periphery of Nationalist power, Mao consolidated
his position (gained during the Long March) as the sole leader of
the Revolution. The classic book on this period is Edgar Snow's
Red Star Over China, which includes some texts by Mao himself.
While
all this was going on, the Japanese were busy occupying Manchuria.
This proved helpful for the Communists -- the troops sent by
Chiang to the North to contain and eventually eliminate the CCP
much preferred to spend their time fighting the Japanese. In late
1936, Chiang's own generals kidnapped him and held him captive
until he agreed to fight the Japanese before fighting the
Communists.
In
1937, the Japanese invaded China proper from their bases in
Manchuria, using the notorious "Marco Polo Bridge"
incident as an excuse. Once whole-scale war had been launched, it
didn't take the Japanese long to occupy the major coastal cities
and commit atrocities. By the time that the war had ended in 1945,
20 million Chinese had died at the hands of the Japanese. The
Nationalist Government fled up the Yangzi to Chongqing from
Nanjing.
In
1939, World War II started. This initially had little effect on
the situation in China, as the Japanese were not involved with war
in Europe. However, after the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, the
main thrust of the Japanese war effort turned away from fighting
the Chinese and towards fighting the Americans.
After
the Americans entered the war, the Communists started to
consolidate their control over North China in preparation for the
resumption of the civil war that would occur after the Japanese
had been defeated.
The
Nationalists, in contrast to the Communists, were disorganized and
corrupt, problems that would only intensify after the war.
Moreover, their attempts to fight the Japanese were ineffective at
best. The general in charge of US efforts inside China, General
Stillwell, lobbied Washington (ineffectively) to channel some aid
to the Communists; this was not because Stillwell was sympathetic
to their cause but because the CCP, employing guerrilla tactics
they had independently developed during the civil war, was simply
doing a better job fighting the Japanese than the Nationalists.
At
the end of World War II, the war between the Nationalists and the
Communists started up again. The Communists were hampered by the
fact that the Japanese were under orders to surrender only to the
Nationalists, not the Communists. This, however, did not end up
making much of a difference. By early 1949, the Nationalists were
hamstrung by intractable corruption and huge debts; they paid off
their debts by printing more money, which only led to
hyperinflation.
By
that October, the Nationalists had fled to Taiwan and Mao Zedong
had proclaimed the creation of the People's Republic of China.
Curiously, while the Red Army was busy re-unifying the south, they
didn't bother re-unifying either Macau or Hong Kong, even though
it would have been extremely easy, and neither Britain or Portugal
would have been in much of a position to protest.
Back
to the Index
In
1950, China intervened in the Korean War to save the North Koreans
from being wiped off the map, and by 1953, the Korean War was over
(actually, South Korea and North Korea are still technically at
war with each other, even though the fighting stopped in 1953).
In
1958, Mao, who was growing increasingly distant from Moscow,
launched the Great Leap Forward. The idea was to mobilize the
peasant masses to increase crop production by collectivizing the
farms and use the excess labor to produce steel. What ended up
happening was the greatest man-made famine in human history. From
1958 to 1960, poor planning and bad management managed to starve
30 million people to death. Officially, the government blamed it
on "bad weather."
By
1962, the break with the Soviets was complete, and China started
to position itself as the 'other' superpower while it recovered
from the Great Leap Forward. Unfortunately, in 1966, Mao launched
the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution.
The origins of the
Cultural Revolution are vague, but probably stem, in part, from a
growing separation between Mao's clique and the rest of the CCP.
Mao called upon students to rebel against authority, and they did,
forming units of Red Guards. China promptly collapsed into
anarchy. Schools shut down, offices closed, transportation was
disrupted -- it was so bad that even today, the full history is
still far from known. In terms of the chaos, blood, and
destruction, it was comparable to the French Revolution, though it
lacked the same political impact. At one point, Red Guards were
fighting pitched battles with Government troops outside of the
Foreign Ministry building. Later on in the Cultural Revolution,
Red Guard units ended up fighting each other for supremacy. In the
summer of 1967, there were massive riots in both Hong Kong and
Macao.
One
of the reasons why Mao was able to pull off something like the
Cultural Revolution was because he was taking on the trappings of
an emperor -- indeed, Mao himself often compared himself to the
First Emperor of China. Another reason was the political support
of the People's Liberation Army, spearheaded by a general named
Lin Biao. During the glory years of the Cultural Revolution, Lin
became very close to Mao, and was appointed his heir-apparent. Lin
was also in charge of developing the 'cult of personality' around
Mao. But after 1969, Lin's position began to deteriorate, and he
vanished in 1971. Lin apparently died in an airplane crash in
Mongolia; the official story is that he was fleeing to Russia. It
is doubtful that the whole story will ever be told, particularly
as the principles involved (Mao and Lin) have taken their secrets
to the grave.

Mao
and Lin
While the Cultural Revolution 'officially' ended in 1969, and the
worst abuses stopped then, the politically charged atmosphere was
maintained until Mao's death in 1976. Deng Xiaoping, who was
purged twice during the Cultural Revolution (once at the
beginning; once again right before Mao died); eventually emerged
as the paramount leader in 1978, and promptly launched his
economic reform program.
Deng's
actions, initially limited to agricultural reforms, gradually
started to spread to the rest of the country. One of his favorite
sayings is "It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white;
what matters is how well it catches mice." This is in direct
contrast to the ideology of the Maoist years, where a favored
slogan was "Better Red than Expert," which meant, in
practice, that totally unqualified ideologues were put in charge
of projects that really needed technical expertise.

In
1982 Margaret Thatcher, then Prime Minister of Britain, went to
Beijing to meet with Deng Xiaopeng. Most of the talks concerned
the issue of Hong Kong. By the time she had left, the United
Kingdom and the People's Republic of China had signed an agreement
in principle to hand Hong Kong from the UK over to China. In 1984,
the agreement was formalized in a document known as the Joint
Declaration.
As
the economic reforms on the mainland spread, the question of
political reform started to come to the surface, propelled by
events in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This came to a head
in Tiananmen Square in May, 1989. The leaders of the Communist
Party saw this as an attack on their power, and proceeded to
destroy it. Officially, 200 demonstrators died. The actual figure
is not known, and it is doubtful that there will ever be an
accurate roll call of those who died on June 4.
In
1993, Deng Xiaoping, in one of his last major public appearances,
toured the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone and emphatically voiced
his approval. After that, the Chinese economy exploded, and it has
only been recently that the economy has cooled off to more
reasonable levels.
One
of the most significant developments in recent history was the
death of Deng, on February 19, 1997. While he has not been active
in politics for some time and has not appeared in public for more
than three years, the deaths of senior leaders has always had an
unsettling impact on Chinese politics. Given Deng's former
position as the paramount leader of the country, the political
shockwaves will not only be substantial, but unpredictable.
Longer
term, it is impossible to predict what will happen next. China
will probably become a leading industrial power sometime in the 21st
century, and it will probably become more closely economically
tied to its East Asian neighbors. However, predictions that China
will become the world's largest economy by the year 2020 are based
on unsustainable growth projections. And if the last 150 years of
Chinese history tells us anything, it is that the only predictable
thing is unpredictability.
(This
historical treatise was written by Paul Frankenstein.)
Back
to the Index